# Corpus note — Laukkonen, Friston & Chandaria (2025), "A beautiful loop: An active inference theory of consciousness"

**Source:** Laukkonen, R., Friston, K., & Chandaria, S. (2025). A beautiful loop: An active inference theory of consciousness. *Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews*, 176, 106296. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106296. Open access (CC BY 4.0). Received 2 Oct 2024, revised 14 Jul 2025, accepted 20 Jul 2025.

**One-line:** A theory-of-consciousness paper proposing three necessary conditions — (1) a unified generative **reality model / epistemic field**, (2) **inferential competition / Bayesian binding** to enter it, (3) **epistemic depth** (recursive, non-local self-reflective sharing of the model, governed by a precision **hyper-model** Φ). The three together form the "beautiful loop." It then reads altered states (meditation, psychedelics, sleep/lucidity, cessation) through this frame.

**Genre caveat for Waypoint:** This is conceptual/formal, not a measurement study — "No data was used" (Data availability). It is *testable/falsifiable at the level of computational modeling*, not yet validated on humans. Its value to Waypoint is a **rigorous phenomenological construct-space + vocabulary** (epistemic depth, precision distribution, dereification, MPE, cessation) that maps cleanly onto Wheel pillars/phases, plus a reference list that is the field's own best-of for measuring these states. Treat every phenomenological "state → coordinate" placement as illustrative, not measured.

---

## 1. USABLE FOR STAGE ASSESSMENT

The paper hands Waypoint a **3-axis phenomenological state space** and several graded constructs. None is a staging scheme per se, but each is a candidate latent dimension or marker family, and several map directly onto the Wheel pillars (awareness / thoughts / emotions / sensations) and onto phase.

### 1a. The core state-space: abstraction × precision-distribution × epistemic depth (Figs 5 & 6)
Three orthogonal axes onto which meditation *states* (not traits/practices) are placed:
- **Abstraction** (low→high): from raw sensations/objects up to narrative self, reasoning, concepts. Where in the hierarchy attention/precision sits.
- **Precision distribution**: **gathered** (precision concentrated on one level of abstraction — a quiet, focused mind, e.g. focused attention / FA) vs **dispersed** (precision spread across many contents — open, panoramic mind).
- **Epistemic depth** (low→high): clarity/intensity of *knowing that you know* — the recursive self-reflective "sensation of knowing."

These give Waypoint an operational decomposition instead of a scalar. Mapping to pillars: abstraction axis ≈ which pillar/content is engaged (sensations→emotions→thoughts→awareness); precision-distribution ≈ concentration vs openness style; epistemic depth ≈ the **awareness pillar's** depth/clarity, largely orthogonal to *what* is attended.

**In a transcript, epistemic depth (high) looks like:** vivid, lucid, self-aware reporting — "I was clearly aware of being aware," "I could watch the whole field at once and know I was watching it," metacognitive precision about one's own state. **Low epistemic depth:** foggy, on-autopilot, "I zoned out," "I don't really know what happened," mind-wandering described without noticing it was wandering. Crucially this is *independent of arousal/effort* — see the dullness discriminator below.

### 1b. FA → OM → Non-dual progression (precision distribution shifts)
- **Focused attention (FA):** gathered precision, low–medium abstraction, comparatively low epistemic depth. Transcript: single-object stability ("I stayed on the breath," "kept coming back to the sensation at the nostrils").
- **Open awareness / open monitoring (OM):** dispersed precision, higher abstraction, higher epistemic depth. Transcript: "I let everything come and go," "aware of the whole field without picking anything out."
- **Non-dual awareness (ND):** luminous awareness present at *any* abstraction level, highest epistemic depth, subject–object duality softening. Transcript: "there was no one meditating," "awareness aware of itself," "no separation between me and what I saw," self-as-space/awareness language. This is the classic FA→OM→ND continuum (from Laukkonen & Slagter's *many-to-(n)one*) rendered as movement in the state space — a plausible ordering signal along the awareness pillar toward Awakening/Unbinding.

### 1c. Dereification (strongest linguistic stage marker in the paper)
Dereification = experiencing thoughts/emotions/percepts as **mental constructs** rather than inherent realities; increases with epistemic depth (higher depth → phenomena become *opaque*, seen as constructed, rather than *transparent*/taken as real). Grounded in the Buddhist three characteristics (*anicca* impermanence, *dukkha* unsatisfactoriness, *anatta* not-self).
- **Transcript discriminator (high stage):** "anger arose and passed," "a thought appeared," "the sadness wasn't me, it was just an event," treating experiences as impermanent, ownerless, constructed.
- **vs (low stage / naïve realism):** "I *am* anxious," "this is just how things are," reifying emotions and self as solid, enduring, inherently real.
- **Caution built in (see §3):** dereified *phrasing* is exactly what a map-reading practitioner learns to produce — this is Waypoint's "insight vocabulary vs lived insight" confusion pair. The marker discriminates only when corroborated by behavior/consistency, not from vocabulary alone.

### 1d. Minimal Phenomenal Experience (MPE) / pure awareness / "tonic alertness"
Formal definition: MPE occurs when **epistemic depth is maximally high AND the reality model is contentless** (minimal precision on ordinary content, but a highly *gathered hyper-precision*). Phenomenology: luminous, clear, simple, singular, non-dual, "openness," bare capacity for knowing — "vividly self-aware yet informationally sparse." Metzinger's tonic alertness; Upanishadic *sushupti*; classical "clarity and luminosity."
- **Transcript (advanced marker):** reports of contentless awareness — "there was just awareness, no objects," "aware but nothing to be aware of," "spacious, clear, empty but alert," often on waking or in deep sitting.
- **Directly resolves the absorption-vs-dullness confusion pair:** MPE/absorption is **high epistemic depth + gathered hyper-precision**; dullness/sleepiness is **low epistemic depth**. Same low-content report, opposite depth. Probe for clarity-of-knowing to discriminate: genuine MPE reporters describe vivid knowing; dull states describe fogginess/absence.

### 1e. Cessation / nirodha ("small death," Stage-3 Unbinding phenomenology)
Cessation = brief (and rarely longer) periods where the reality model transiently **collapses/unbinds** — no experience occurs (akin to endogenous general anesthesia); a "reset." Reached by *actively deconstructing* the reality model (letting go of clinging; deconstructing the five aggregates). After-effects (post-cessation): profound **clarity, freshness, cognitive/emotional flexibility, positive affect, compassion**; sometimes an axiomatic shift in perspective; improved ability to meditate.
- **Transcript (Stage-3 marker, `small_death` milestone):** reports of gaps/discontinuities — "I blinked out," "there was a break and then everything came back fresh," "I don't think anything happened but something reset," waking up changed. May *not* be noticed as an absence — reported as a shift rather than a blank.
- **After-effect signature is corroborating evidence** even when the event itself is not clearly reported: unusual post-sit clarity/flexibility/compassion clustered in time.

### 1f. Lucidity gradients across sleep (sustained-depth inertia marker)
Epistemic depth is diminished in NREM (minimal/absent reality model) and richer in REM but typically low lucidity ("we don't know that we know" we are dreaming). **Lucid dreaming** = epistemic depth significantly increased vs non-lucid REM (partial reactivation of reflective mechanisms). **Lucid dreamless sleep / "clear light sleep"** = very low abstraction but high epistemic depth (contentless but aware) — rare, associated with advanced practice.
- **Transcript (advanced marker):** spontaneous lucid dreams, reflective awareness carrying into sleep, "clear light" / aware-during-deep-sleep reports. The paper's mechanism: daytime meta-awareness/reflective habit builds "inertia" that spills into sleep — so lucidity frequency is a plausible proxy for *habitual* epistemic depth (a trait-ish signal, not just a state).

### 1g. Meta-awareness, insight/"Eureka," and System-2 as depth-dependent
- Everyday **meta-awareness** (noticing mind-wandering, being aware of thinking) is graded epistemic depth in daily life — a low-cost passive-conversation signal.
- **Insight/Eureka** and **System-2 analytic reasoning** depend on epistemic depth; deep analytic work can feel like flow with low awareness *of* the doing. Relevant to distinguishing the *thoughts/clarity* pillar's development.

### 1h. Cross-framework concordance (Table 2)
Maps Beautiful Loop's five features (reality model, binding, inferential competition, reflexivity, epistemic depth, widespread sharing, MPE) against GNWS, IIT, RPT, HOT with explicit ↝ (resonance) / ✗ (no equivalent) marks. Useful as a template for a disciplined Wheel-band ↔ construct-dimension concordance (see §2).

### 1i. Psychedelic caution-marker
Psychedelics reliably increase the *feeling* of expanded awareness / noetic certainty (knowing, realness) via epistemic-depth boost + prior relaxation (REBUS) — but "the concomitant relaxation of learned beliefs... may not necessarily favour accurate models." A confident felt-sense of insight ≠ accurate/advanced insight. Directly relevant to devotional/mystical-intensity-vs-destabilization and enthusiasm-inflation confusions.

---

## 2. METHODOLOGY WORTH COPYING

This is a theory paper, so "methodology" = modeling/operationalization moves, not measurement protocols:

1. **Decompose the state into orthogonal axes, not a scalar (Figs 5–6).** The abstraction × precision-distribution × epistemic-depth cube is exactly the spirit of Waypoint's per-pillar profile + position/phase split. Consider adopting a small orthogonal latent basis (e.g. a "clarity/epistemic-depth" latent distinct from a "content/abstraction" latent and a "concentration-openness" latent) rather than collapsing everything into band position. It makes "2.4-deep in awareness, untrained emotions" representable.

2. **Formalize before you claim (Table 1).** Every construct is tied to a generative-model equation (multilayer generative process, global hyper-model, local/hyper free-energy). Waypoint's estimator memo should likewise pin each marker/likelihood to an explicit place in the Bayesian state space rather than leaving markers as loose adjectives.

3. **Cross-framework concordance table with explicit similarity marks (Table 2).** Copy this format for a Wheel-band ↔ construct concordance: for each band/pillar, mark which literature constructs resonate (↝) or don't (✗), forcing honesty about where the model has empirical support vs none.

4. **Triangulate neurophenomenology.** The paper leans on Lutz et al.'s program of triangulating first-person reports with neural/behavioral data — the same triangulated-calibration stance Waypoint takes (Surya interview + dossier + telemetry + instruments). Cite it as precedent for the method.

5. **Name existing validated instruments for the target constructs** (mined for the psychometrics lane): **NADA** (Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment; Hanley et al. 2018) and the **MPE-92M** pure-awareness questionnaire (Gamma & Metzinger 2021) are purpose-built for exactly the ND/MPE phenomenology at the top of the Wheel — strong candidates for the one-time calibration battery. Also Fleming's metacognition-measurement work for the epistemic-depth/meta-awareness axis.

---

## 3. CAUTIONS

1. **No empirical validation.** Conceptual/formal only ("No data was used"); testable in principle, untested in practice. Do not cite it as evidence *that* a marker tracks stage — cite it for the *construct* and its predicted phenomenology.

2. **State-placement in the cube is illustrative.** The positions of FA/OM/ND/MPE/mind-wandering in Figs 5–6 are conceptual sketches, not measured coordinates. Don't hard-code thresholds off them.

3. **The paper is itself a vocabulary-contamination vector.** It supplies rich, quotable phenomenological language (epistemic depth, dereification, luminosity, non-dual, cessation-as-reset). A map-reading practitioner (the whole team cohort, per spec §7) can reproduce this language without the lived attainment. Every §1 linguistic marker must be scored on *structure + behavioral corroboration + consistency*, never on presence of the vocabulary. This is the paper's implicit warning made explicit for Waypoint.

4. **Felt-knowing is not accurate-knowing.** The psychedelic/noetic passage and cited work (Grimmer et al. 2022/2023 on *eliciting false insights*; "deeply felt effect" without truth) warn that a confident *sensation of knowing* can be induced and false. Self-reported certainty/insight/expanded-awareness is a marker of felt epistemic depth, not of correctness or stage — deflate its weight and cross-check.

5. **MPE looks like its opposite.** "Vividly self-aware yet informationally sparse" is phenomenologically close to dullness/absence on a surface read; only the clarity-of-knowing dimension separates them. Any low-content report needs a depth probe before it's scored as advanced.

6. **Absence may not be noticed.** Cessations "may not always be noticed... instead noticed as a shift or axiomatic change." So `small_death`/cessation self-report will be *under*-claimed and oddly described — weight after-effect signatures, don't expect clean "I experienced a cessation" statements.

7. **Weak/speculative links flagged by the authors themselves:** proto-epistemic-depth in cells/insects, the specific broadcast channels (neuromodulator sprays, EM fields) — all marked speculative and irrelevant to Waypoint. Ignore the substrate mechanism; keep the phenomenology.

---

## 4. REFERENCES

### 4a. Full reference list (extracted, pp. 16–19)

Agrawal, Zhang, Yuan, Han & Peng 2025 — The unreasonable effectiveness of entropy minimization in LLM reasoning. arXiv:2505.15134.
Agrawal & Laukkonen 2024 — Nothingness in meditation: making sense of emptiness and cessation. *Var. Nothingness*.
Alcaraz-Sanchez 2023 — Awareness in the void: a micro-phenomenological exploration of conscious dreamless sleep. *Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci.* 22(4), 867–905.
Alkire, Hudetz & Tononi 2008 — Consciousness and anaesthesia. *Science* 322(5903), 876–880.
Allen, Levy, Parr, Friston 2019 — In the Body's eye: computational anatomy of interoceptive inference. bioRxiv 603928.
Amari & Arbib 1977 — Competition and cooperation in neural nets. *Syst. Neurosci.* 119–165.
Anālayo 2017 — The luminous mind in Theravāda and dharmaguptaka discourses. *J. Oxf. Cent. Buddh. Stud.* 13.
Ansorge, Kunde & Kiefer 2014 — Unconscious vision and executive control. *Conscious. Cogn.* 27, 268–287.
Armstrong 2021 — A mind without craving. Suttavada Foundation.
Aru, Suzuki, Rutiku, Larkum & Bachmann 2019 — Coupling the state and contents of consciousness. *Front. Syst. Neurosci.* 13, 43.
Baars 2005 — Global workspace theory of consciousness: toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience. *Prog. Brain Res.* 150, 45–53.
Baars, Franklin & Ramsoy 2013 — Global workspace dynamics: cortical "binding and propagation" enables conscious contents. *Front. Psychol.* 4, 200.
Baird, Castelnovo, Gosseries, Tononi 2018 — Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. *Sci. Rep.* 8(1), 17798.
Baird, Mota-Rolim, Dresler 2019 — Cognitive neuroscience of lucid dreaming. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.* 100, 305–323.
Baltzell, Srinivasan & Richards 2019 — Hierarchical organization of melodic sequences is encoded by cortical entrainment. *NeuroImage* 200(3), 490–500.
Barrett 2020 — Seven and a half lessons about the brain. Houghton Mifflin.
Berger 2015 — Encounters of mind: luminosity and personhood in Indian and Chinese thought. State University of New York Press.
Berkovich-Ohana 2017 — A case study of a meditation-induced altered state: increased overall gamma synchronization. *Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci.* 16(1), 91–106.
Berkovich-Ohana, Brown, Gallagher, Barendregt, Bauer, Giommi, Amaro 2024 — Pattern Theory of Selflessness: How Meditation May Transform the Self-Pattern. *Mindfulness*, 1–27.
Bhartṛhari 1963 — [Vākyapadīya, with Helārāja commentary]. Deccan College.
Biddell, Solms, Slagter, Laukkonen & Tsakiris 2024 — Arousal coherence, uncertainty, and well-being: an active inference account. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2024(1) niae011.
Boisvert 1995 — The five aggregates: understanding Theravāda psychology and soteriology. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.
Boly, Garrido, Gosseries, Bruno, Boveroux, Schnakers, Friston 2011 — Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. *Science* 332(6031), 858–862.
Braun, Balkin, Wesensten, Carson, Varga, Baldwin, Herscovitch 1997 — Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle. *Brain* 120(7), 1173–1197.
Breese 1909 — Binocular rivalry. *Psychol. Rev.* 16(6), 410.
Brown, Lau & LeDoux 2019 — Understanding the higher-order approach to consciousness. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 23(9), 754–768.
Burbea 2014 — Seeing that frees: meditations on emptiness and dependent arising. Hermes Amara Publications.
Carhart-Harris 2018 — The entropic brain revisited. *Neuropharmacology* 142, 167–178.
Carhart-Harris & Friston 2019 — REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. *Pharmacol. Rev.* 71(3), 316–344.
Carhart-Harris, Leech, Hellyer, Shanahan, Feilding, Tagliazucchi, Nutt 2014 — The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 8, 20.
Carruthers 2017 — Higher-order theories of consciousness. In: Blackwell companion to consciousness, 288–297.
Chalmers 1995 — Facing up to the problem of consciousness. *J. Conscious. Stud.* 2(3), 200–219.
Chalmers 1997 — The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford Paperbacks.
Chang, Biehl, Yu & Kanai 2020 — Information closure theory of consciousness. *Front. Psychol.* 11, 1504.
Chowdhury, van Lutterveld, Laukkonen, Slagter, Ingram, Sacchet 2023 — Investigation of advanced mindfulness meditation "cessation" experiences using EEG spectral analysis in an intensively sampled case study. *Neuropsychologia* 190, 108694.
Ciaunica & Crucianelli 2019 — Minimal self-awareness: from within a developmental perspective. *J. Conscious. Stud.* 26(3–4), 207–226.
Clark 2013 — Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. *Behav. Brain Sci.* 36(3), 181–204.
Clark 2019 — Consciousness as generative entanglement. *J. Philos.* 116(12), 645–660.
Cleeremans, Achoui, Beauny, Keuninckx, Martin, Muñoz-Moldes, De Heering 2020 — Learning to be conscious. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 24(2), 112–123.
Cordeschi, Tamburrini, Trautteur 1999 — The notion of loop in the study of consciousness. *Neuroscience* 524–540.
Dahl, Lutz, Davidson 2015 — Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 19(9), 515–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001.
Dass 1971 — Be here now. Harmony.
Deane 2021 — Consciousness in action: deep self-models, other minds, and the challenge of psychedelic-induced ego-dissolution. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2021(2), niab024.
Deane, Miller & Wilkinson 2020 — Losing ourselves: active inference, depersonalization, and meditation. *Front. Psychol.* 11, 539706.
Dehaene & Changeux 2011 — Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. *Neuron* 70(2), 200–227.
Dehaene, Charles, King, Marti 2014 — Toward a computational theory of conscious processing. *Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.* 25, 76–84.
Dehaene, Lau, Kouider 2017 — What is consciousness, and could machines have it? *Science* 358(6362), 486–492.
Dehaene, Meyniel, Wacongne, Wang, Pallier 2015 — The neural representation of sequences: from transition probabilities to algebraic patterns and linguistic trees. *Neuron* 88(1), 2–19.
Dennett 1995 — Consciousness: more like fame than television. Munich Conf. Vol.
Dennett 2001 — Are we explaining consciousness yet? *Cognition* 79(1–2), 221–237.
Dietrich 2004 — Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. *Conscious. Cogn.* 13(4), 746–761.
Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, Poeppel 2015 — Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. *Nat. Neurosci.* 19(1), 158–164. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4186.
Dolega & Dewhurst 2021 — Fame in the predictive brain: a deflationary approach to explaining consciousness in the prediction error minimization framework. *Synthese* 198(8), 7781–7806.
Dor-Ziderman, Berkovich-Ohana, Glicksohn, Goldstein 2013 — Mindfulness-induced selflessness: a MEG neurophenomenological study. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 7, 582.
Dresler, Wehrle, Spoormaker, Koch, Holsboer, Steiger, Czisch 2012 — Neural correlates of dream lucidity obtained from contrasting lucid vs non-lucid REM sleep. *Sleep* 35(7), 1017–1020.
Dunne 2011 — Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness. In: Mindfulness (Routledge), 71–88.
Dunne, Thompson, Schooler 2019 — Mindful meta-awareness: sustained and non-propositional. *Curr. Opin. Psychol.* 28, 307–311.
Dutt 1964 — Nirvana Vijnaptimatrata.
Eagleman 2001 — Visual illusions and neurobiology. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 2(12), 920–926.
Elgendi, Kumar, Barbic, Howard, Abbott, Cichocki 2018 — Subliminal priming — state of the art and future perspectives. *Brain Sci.* 8(6), 54.
Esser, Hill, Tononi 2009 — Breakdown of effective connectivity during slow wave sleep. *J. Neurophysiol.* 102(4), 2096–2111. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00059.2009.
Feldman & Friston 2010 — Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 4, 215.
Ficco, Mancuso, Manuello, Teneggi, Liloia, Duca, Cauda 2021 — Disentangling predictive processing in the brain: a meta-analytic study in favour of a predictive network. *Sci. Rep.* 11(1), 16258.
Fields & Levin 2022 — Competency in navigating arbitrary spaces as an invariant for analyzing cognition in diverse embodiments. *Entropy* 24(6), 819.
Fields, Glazebrook & Levin 2021 — A free energy principle for generic quantum systems. arXiv:2112.15242.
Fields, Glazebrook & Levin 2024 — Principled limitations on self-representation for generic physical systems. *Entropy* 26, 194.
Fields, Levin 2023 — Regulative development as a model for origin of life and artificial life models. *Biosystems* 229, 104927.
Fleming 2020 — Awareness as inference in a higher-order state space. *Neurosci. Conscious.* niz020.
Fleming, Dolan & Frith 2012 — Metacognition: computation, biology and function. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.* 367, 1280–1286.
Fleming, Frith, Goodale, Lau, LeDoux, Lee, Slagter 2023 — Integr. Inf. Theory Consciousness. pseudoscience.
Fleming & Lau 2014 — How to measure metacognition. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 8, 443.
Fröhlich & McCormick 2010 — Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. *Neuron* 67(1), 129–143.
Friston 2006 — A free energy principle for the brain. *J. Physiol. Paris* 100(1–3), 70–87.
Friston 2008 — Hierarchical models in the brain. *PLoS Comput. Biol.* 4(11), e1000211.
Friston 2010 — The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 11(2), 127–138.
Friston 2018 — Does predictive coding have a future? *Nat. Neurosci.* 21(8), 1019–1021.
Friston, Breakspear, Deco 2012 — Perception and self-organized instability. *Front. Comput. Neurosci.* 6, 44.
Friston, FitzGerald, Rigoli, Schwartenbeck, Pezzulo 2017 — Active inference: a process theory. *Neural Comput.* 29(1), 1–49.
Friston, Heins, Verbelen, Da Costa, Salvatori, Markovic, Tschantz, Koudahl, Buckley, Parr 2024 — From pixels to planning: scale-free active inference. arXiv:2407.20292.
Friston & Kiebel 2009 — Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.* 364(1521), 1211–1221.
Frith 2010 — What is consciousness for? *Pragmat. Cogn.* 18(3), 497–551.
Frith 2021 — The neural basis of consciousness. *Psychol. Med.* 51(4), 550–562.
Gamma & Metzinger 2021 — The minimal phenomenal experience questionnaire (MPE-92M): towards a phenomenological profile of "pure awareness" experiences in meditators. *PLoS One* 16(7), e0253694.
George & Hawkins 2009 — Towards a mathematical theory of cortical micro-circuits. *PLoS Comput. Biol.* 5(10), e1000532.
Grimmer, Laukkonen, Tangen, von Hippel, Hohwy 2022 — Eliciting false insights with semantic priming. *Psychon. Bull. Rev.* 29(3), 954–970.
Grimmer, Laukkonen, Freydenzon, Laukkonen, Hohwy 2023 — Deeply felt affect: the emergence of valence in deep active inference. PsyArXiv.
Gyatso 2010 — Essence of the Heart Sutra: the Dalai Lama's heart of Wisdom Teachings.
Hanley, Nakamura, Garland 2018 — The nondual awareness dimensional assessment (NADA): new tools to assess nondual traits and states of consciousness occurring within and beyond the context of meditation. *Psychol. Assess.* 30(12), 1625.
Harari 2014 — Sapiens: a brief history of humankind. Random House.
Hayat, Marmelshtein, Krom, Sela, Tankus, Strauss, Nir, Tononi 2022 — Reduced neural feedback signaling despite robust neuron and gamma auditory responses during human sleep. *Nat. Neurosci.* 25(7), 935–943.
Hesp, Smith, Parr, Allen, Friston, Ramstead 2024 — Deeply felt affect: the emergence of valence in deep active inference. PsyArXiv.
Hobson, Friston 2014 — The cognitive neuroscience of sleep: neuronal systems, consciousness and learning. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 3(9), 679–693.
Hohwy 2012 — Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. *Front. Psychol.* 3, 96.
Hohwy 2013 — The predictive mind. Oxford University Press.
Hohwy 2016 — The self-evidencing brain. *Noûs* 50(2), 259–285.
Hohwy 2022 — Conscious self-evidencing. *Rev. Philos. Psychol.* 13(4), 809–828.
Hohwy, Roepstorff, Friston 2008 — Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. *Cognition* 108(3), 687–701.
Hohwy & Seth 2020 — Predictive processing as a systematic basis for identifying the neural correlates of consciousness. *Philos. Mind Sci.* 1(2), 3.
Holecek 2016 — Dream yoga: illuminating your life through lucid dreaming and the Tibetan yogas of sleep. Sounds True. [as Holecek 2020 in text — Dream yoga workbook]
Horovitz, Braun, Carr, Picchioni, Balkin, Fukunaga, Duyn 2009 — Decoupling of the brain's default mode network during deep sleep. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.* 106(27), 11376–11381.
Hunt & Schooler 2019 — The easy part of the hard problem: a resonance theory of consciousness. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 13, 447026.
Huxley 1968 — The doors of perception. Chatto and Windus, London.
Iglesias, Mathys, Brodersen, Kasper, Piccirelli, den Ouden, Stephan 2013 — Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning. *Neuron* 80, 519–530.
Ingram 2018 — Mastering the core teachings of the buddha: an unusually hardcore dharma book. Revised & expanded ed. Aeon Book/Weiser.
James 1890 — The principles of psychology. Vol 1. Henry Holt & Co.
Josipovic 2019 — Nondual awareness: consciousness-as-such as non-representational reflexivity. *Prog. Brain Res.* 244, 273–298.
Josipovic, Dinstein, Weber, Heeger 2012 — Influence of meditation on anti-correlated networks in the brain. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 5, 183.
Kahneman 2011 — Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kakigi, Naka, Okusa, Wang, Inui, Qiu, Hoshiyama 2003 — Sensory perception during sleep in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. *Sleep Med.* 4(6), 493–507.
Kanai, Chang, Yu, Magrans de Abril, Biehl, Guttenberg 2019 — Information generation as a functional basis of consciousness. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2019(1), niz016.
Kanai, Komura, Shipp, Friston 2015 — Cerebral hierarchies: predictive processing, precision and the pulvinar. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.* 370(1668), 20140169.
Kastrup 2008 — On the plausibility of idealism: refuting criticisms. *Disputatio* 9(44), 13–34.
Keller & Mrsic-Flogel 2018 — Predictive processing: a canonical cortical computation. *Neuron* 100(2), 424–435.
Kentridge & Heywood 2000 — Metacognition and awareness. *Conscious. Cogn.* 9(2), 308–312.
Knill & Pouget 2004 — The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. *Trends Neurosci.* 27(12), 712–719.
Koch, Massimini, Boly, Tononi 2016 — Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 17(5), 307–321.
Koriat & Levy-Sadot 2000 — Conscious and unconscious metacognition: a rejoinder. *Conscious. Cogn.* 9(2), 193–202.
Kouider & Dehaene 2007 — Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.* 362(1481), 857–875.
Kounios & Beeman 2014 — The cognitive neuroscience of insight. *Annu. Rev. Psychol.* 65, 71–93.
Kuhn 2024 — A landscape of consciousness: toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications. *Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.* 190, 28–169.
Lamme & Roelfsema 2000 — The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. *Trends Neurosci.* 23(11), 571–579.
Lau 2022 — In consciousness we trust: the cognitive neuroscience of subjective experience. Oxford University Press.
Lau & Passingham 2006 — Relative blindsight in normal observers and the neural correlate of visual consciousness. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.* 103(49), 18763–18768.
Lau & Rosenthal 2011 — Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 15(8), 365–373.
Laukkonen, Kaveladze, Tangen, Slagter 2020 — The dark side of eureka: artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel truer. *Cognition* 196, 104122.
Laukkonen, Sacchet, Barendregt, Devaney, Chowdhury, Slagter 2023 — Cessations of consciousness in meditation: advancing a scientific understanding of nirodha samāpatti. *Prog. Brain Res.* 280, 61–87.
Laukkonen & Slagter 2021 — From many to (n)one: meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.* 128, 199–217.
Laukkonen, Tangen 2018 — Can observing a Necker cube make you more insightful? *Conscious. Cogn.* 198–211.
Laukkonen, Webb, Salvi, Tangen, Slagter, Schooler 2024 — Insight and the selection of ideas. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.* 105363.
Laureys 2005 — The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 9(12), 556–559.
Lazlo, Alpert, Metzner 2017 — The psychedelic experience: a manual based on the Tibetan book of the dead. Citadel. [Leary, Alpert, Metzner]
Lee & Mumford 2003 — Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. *J. Opt. Soc. Am. A* 20(7), 1434–1448.
Letheby & Gerrans 2017 — Self unbound: ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2017(1), nix016.
Levine 1983 — Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. *Pac. Philos. Q.* 64(4), 354–361.
Limanowski & Friston 2018 — Seeing the dark: grounding phenomenal transparency and opacity in precision estimation for active inference. *Front. Psychol.* 9, 643.
Lingpa 2014 — [The Vajra Essence / Dudjom Lingpa's Visions of the Great Perfection] (Wallace, trans.). Wisdom Publications.
Llinás 2003 — Consciousness and the thalamocortical loop. In: International congress series 1250, 411–416.
Loo & Cheng 2022 — Dream lucidity positively correlates with reality monitoring. *Conscious. Cogn.* 105, 103414.
Lopez-Sola, Sanchez-Todo, Vohryzek, Ruffini 2025 — Algorithm Agent Model: Pure Aware. Minimal Exp. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/fgxec_v2.
Lutz, Dunne, Davidson 2007 — Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness. In: Cambridge handbook of consciousness, 499–551.
Lutz, Jha, Dunne, Saron 2015 — Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices from a neurocognitive perspective. *Am. Psychol.* 70(7), 632.
Lutz, Mattout, Pagnoni 2019 — The epistemic and pragmatic value of non-action: a predictive coding perspective on meditation. *Curr. Opin. Psychol.* 28, 166–171.
Mack 2003 — Inattentional blindness: looking without seeing. *Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.* 12(5), 180–184.
Maier 1931 — Reasoning and learning. *Psychol. Rev.* 38(4), 332–346.
Maquet, Péters, Aerts, Delfiore, Degueldre, Luxen, Franck 1996 — Functional neuroanatomy of human rapid-eye-movement sleep and dreaming. *Nature* 383(6596), 163–166.
Marder 2012 — Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits: back to the future. *Neuron* 76(1), 1–11.
Marty-Dugas, Howes, Smilek 2021 — Sustained attention and the experience of flow. *Psychol. Res.* 85(7), 2682–2696.
Mashour & Hudetz 2018 — Neural correlates of unconsciousness in large-scale brain networks. *Trends Neurosci.* 41(3), 150–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.003.
Massimini, Ferrarelli, Huber, Esser, Singh, Tononi 2005 — Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. *Science* 309(5744), 2228–2232. DOI: 10.1126/science.1117256.
Mathys, Daunizeau, Friston, Stephan 2011 — A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 5, 39.
McGovern, Grimmer, Doss, Hutchinson, Timmermann, Lyon, Laukkonen 2024 — An integrated theory of false insights and beliefs under psychedelics. *Commun. Psychol.* 2(1), 69.
McMillen & Levin 2024 — Collective intelligence: a unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates. *Commun. Biol.* 7(1), 378.
Metcalfe & Wiebe 1987 — Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. *Mem. Cogn.* 15(3), 238–246.
Metzinger 2003 — Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference. *Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci.* 2(4), 353–393.
Metzinger 2017 — The problem of mental action — Predictive control without sensory sheets. In: Philosophy and Predictive Processing. MIND Group, 19–26.
Metzinger 2020 — Minimal phenomenal experience: meditation, tonic alertness, and the phenomenology of "pure" consciousness. *Philos. Mind Sci.* 1(I), 1–44.
Metzinger 2024 — The elephant and the blind: the experience of pure consciousness: philosophy, science, and 500+ experiential reports. MIT Press.
Miller & Cohen 2001 — An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.* 24(1), 167–202.
Nave, Deane, Miller, Clark 2020 — Wilding the predictive brain. *Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci.* 11(6), e1542.
Nir, Staba, Andrillon, Vyazovskiy, Cirelli, Fried, Tononi 2011 — Regional slow waves and spindles in human sleep. *Neuron* 70(1), 153–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.043.
Nir & Tononi 2010 — Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 14(2), 88–100.
Nisbett & Schachter 1966 — Cognitive manipulation of pain. *J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.* 2(3), 227–236.
Nisbett & Wilson 1977 — Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. *Psychol. Rev.* 84(3), 231–259.
Oizumi, Albantakis, Tononi 2014 — From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: integrated information theory 3.0. *PLoS Comput. Biol.* 10(5), e1003588.
Ovington, Saliba, Moran, Goldring, MacDonald, Ohan 2018 — Do people really have insights in the shower? *J. Creat. Behav.* 52(1), 21–34.
Padmasambhava, Gyatrul 2008 — Natural liberation: Padmasambhava's teachings on the six bardos (Wallace, trans.). Wisdom Publications.
Pagnoni 2019 — The contemplative exercise through the lenses of predictive processing: a promising approach. *Prog. Brain Res.* 244, 299–322.
Parr & Friston 2017 — Uncertainty, epistemics and active inference. *J. R. Soc. Interface* 14, 20170376.
Parr & Friston 2018 — The anatomy of inference: generative models and brain structure. *Front. Comput. Neurosci.* 12, 90.
Parr & Friston 2019 — The computational pharmacology of oculomotion. *Psychopharmacology* 236(8), 2473–2484.
Parr, Pezzulo, Friston 2022 — Active inference: the free energy principle in mind, brain, and behavior. MIT Press.
Parvizi-Wayne, Severs, Pitliya, Ramstead, Friston, Kanai 2024 — Forgetting ourselves in flow: an active inference account of flow states and how we experience ourselves within them. *Front. Psychol.* 15.
Patel, Baker, Scherer 2019 — Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving. *J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.* 148(12), 2129–2153.
Peelen, Berlot, de Lange 2024 — Predictive processing of scenes and objects. *Nat. Rev. Psychol.* 3, 13–26.
Pennartz, Dora, Muckli, Lorteije 2019 — Towards a unified view on pathways and functions of neural representations of consciousness. *Prog. Neurobiol.* 42(9), 589–603.
Prest, Berryman, Prest 2024 — Towards Act. Inference Acc. Deep Medit. Deconstruction. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/d3gpf.
Radakovic, Radakovic, Peryer, Geere, Aran 2022 — Psychedelics and mindfulness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *J. Psychedelic Stud.* 6(2), 137–153.
Ramstead, Seth, Hesp, Sandved-Smith, Mago, Lifshitz, Constant 2022 — From generative models to generative passages: a computational approach to (neuro)phenomenology. *Rev. Philos. Psychol.* 13(4), 829–857.
Rosenthal 2000 — Consciousness, content, and metacognitive judgments. *Conscious. Cogn.* 9(2), 203–214.
Rudrauf, Bennequin, Granic, Landini, Friston, Williford 2017 — A mathematical model of embodied consciousness. *J. Theor. Biol.* 428, 106–131.
Safron 2020 — An integrated world modeling theory (IWMT) of consciousness: combining integrated information and global neuronal workspace theories with the free energy principle and active inference framework. *Front. Artif. Intell.* 3, 520574.
Safron 2022 — Integrated world modeling theory expanded: implications for the future of consciousness. *Front. Comput. Neurosci.* 16, 642397.
Sajid, Tigas, Friston 2022 — Active inference, preference learning and adaptive behaviour. *IOP Conf. Series* 1261, 012020.
Salvi, Wiley & Smith (Eds.) 2024 — The emergence of insight. Cambridge University Press.
Sandved-Smith, Bogotá, Hohwy, Kiverstein, Lutz 2022 — Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience. https://www.researchhub.com/paper/6171544/.
Sandved-Smith, Hesp, Mattout, Friston, Lutz, Ramstead 2021 — Towards a computational phenomenology of mental action: modelling meta-awareness and attentional control with deep parametric active inference. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2021(1), niab018.
Sandved-Smith, Hohwy, Kiverstein, Lutz 2024 — Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience. Preprint.
Sarasso, Casali, Casarotto, Rosanova, Sinigaglia, Massimini 2021 — Consciousness and complexity: a consilience of evidence. *Neurosci. Conscious.* 2021(2), niab023.
Saunders, Roe, Clark, Clegg 2016 — Lucid dreaming incidence: a quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research. *Conscious. Cogn.* 43, 197–215.
Sayadaw 2016 — Manual of insight. Simon and Schuster.
Schooler 2002 — Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 6(8), 339–344.
Schooler, Gross, Zedelius, Seli 2024 — Mind wandering. In: The emergence of insight, 140–165.
Schooler, Smallwood, Christoff, Handy, Reichle, Sayette 2011 — Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 15(7), 319–326.
Schwartenbeck, FitzGerald, Mathys, Dolan, Friston 2015 — The dopaminergic midbrain encodes the expected certainty about desired outcomes. *Cereb. Cortex* 25, 3434–3445.
Searle 2002 — Consciousness and language. Cambridge University Press.
Seth 2013 — Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 17(11), 565–573.
Seth 2024 — Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism. *Behav. Brain Sci.* 1–42.
Seth & Bayne 2022 — Theories of consciousness. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 23(7), 439–452.
Seth & Tsakiris 2018 — Being a beast machine: the somatic basis of selfhood. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 22(11), 969–981.
Shea & Frith 2019 — The global workspace needs metacognition. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 23(6), 560–571.
Shine 2019 — Neuromodulatory influences on integration and segregation in the brain. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 23(7), 572–583.
Shine, Aburn, Breakspear, Poldrack 2018 — The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain. *eLife* 7, e31130.
Shine, Müller, Eli, Munn, Cabral, Moran, Breakspear 2021 — Computational models link cellular mechanisms of neuromodulation to large-scale neural dynamics. *Nat. Neurosci.* 24(6), 765–776.
Simons 2000 — Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 4(4), 147–155.
Simons & Chabris 1999 — Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. *Perception* 28(9), 1059–1074.
Simons & Levin 1997 — Change blindness. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 1(7), 261–267.
Skorupski 2012 — Consciousness and luminosity in Indian and Tibetan buddhism. *Buddh. Philos. Medit. Pract.* 43–67.
Slagter, Davidson, Lutz 2011 — Mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 5, 17.
Smigielski, Kometer, Scheidegger, Krähenmann, Huber, Vollenweider, Fox 2019 — Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. *Sci. Rep.* 9(1), 14914.
Smith, Lane, Parr, Friston 2019 — Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying emotional awareness: insights afforded by deep active inference and their potential clinical relevance. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.* 107, 473–491.
Solms 2021 — The hidden spring: a journey to the source of consciousness. Profile Books.
Sparby & Sacchet 2024 — Toward a unified account of advanced concentrative absorption meditation: a systematic review and classification of Jhāna. *Mindfulness* 1–20.
Strachan, Albergo, Borghini, Pansardi, Scaliti, Gupta, Becchio, Fedus 2024 — Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans. *Nat. Hum. Behav.* 1–11.
Strauss, Sitt, King, Elbaz, Azizi, Buiatti, Dehaene 2015 — Disruption of hierarchical predictive coding during sleep. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.* 112(11), E1353–E1362.
Stumbrys & Erlacher 2017 — Mindfulness and lucid dream frequency predicts the ability to control lucid dreams. *Imagin. Cogn. Personal.* 36(3), 229–239.
Stumbrys, Erlacher, Malinowski 2015 — Meta-awareness during day and night: the relationship between mindfulness and lucid dreaming. *Imagin. Cogn. Personal.* 34(4), 415–433.
Suzuki, Seth, Schwartzman 2024 — Modelling phenomenological differences in aetiologically distinct visual hallucinations using deep neural networks. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 17, 1159821.
Tagliazucchi, van Someren 2017 — The large-scale functional connectivity correlates of consciousness and arousal during the healthy and pathological human sleep cycle. *NeuroImage* 160, 55–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.026.
Taylor, Hobbs, Burroni, Siegelmann 2015 — The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions. *Sci. Rep.* 5(1), 18112. DOI: 10.1038/srep18112.
Thanissaro Bhikkhu (trans.) 2012 — Nibbāna Sutta: Unbinding (3) (Ud 8.3).
Thompson 2015 — Dreamless sleep, the embodied mind, and consciousness. In: Open MIND, 37. MIND Group.
To, Lok, Tsang, Tripitaka Hsuan, Hsu, T'an, Shih, K'un Li, French 2000 — Prajna Paramita Heart Sutra, 2nd ed. Buddha Dharma Education Association.
Tong, Meng, Blake 2006 — Neural bases of binocular rivalry. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 10(11), 502–511.
Tononi 2005 — Consciousness, information integration, and the brain. *Prog. Brain Res.* 150, 109–126.
Tononi 2008 — Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. *Biol. Bull.* 215(3), 216–242. DOI: 10.2307/25470707.
Tononi & Massimini 2008 — Why does consciousness fade in early sleep? *Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.* 1129(1), 330–334. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1417.024.
Treisman 1996 — The binding problem. *Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.* 6(2), 171–178.
Varela, Thompson, Rosch 2017 — The embodied mind, revised ed.: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Voss, Holzmann, Tuin, Hobson 2009 — Lucid dreaming: a state of consciousness with features of both waking and non-lucid dreaming. *Sleep* 32(9), 1191–1200.
Walsh, McGovern, Clark, O'Connell 2020 — Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception. *Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.* 1464(1), 242–268.
Webb, Little, Cropper, Sales 2018 — Once more with feeling: normative data for the aha experience in insight and noninsight problems. *Behav. Res. Methods* 50(5), 2035–2056.
Wegner 2002 — The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press.
Wei, Tay, Bommasani, Raffel, Zoph, Borgeaud, Fedus 2022 — Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv:2206.07682.
Weiskrantz 1986 — Blindsight: a case study and implications. Oxford University Press.
Whyte & Smith 2021 — The predictive global neuronal workspace: a formal active inference model of visual consciousness. *Prog. Neurobiol.* 199, 101918.
Whyte, Corcoran, Robinson, Smith, Moran, Parr, Hohwy 2024 — The emergent theory of consciousness implicit in active inference. arXiv:2410.06633.
Wilf, Ramot, Furman-Haran, Arzi, Levkovitz, Malach 2016 — Diminished auditory responses during NREM sleep correlate with the hierarchy of language processing. *PLoS One* 11(6), e0157143.
Williams 2013 — The reflexive nature of awareness: a Tibetan madhyamaka defence. Routledge.
Williford, Bennequin, Friston, Rudrauf 2018 — The projective consciousness model and phenomenal selfhood. *Front. Psychol.* 9, 2571.
Windt 2015 — Just in time — Dreamless sleep experience as pure subjective temporality. In: Open mind. MIND Group.
Windt 2020 — Consciousness in sleep: how findings from sleep and dream research challenge our understanding of sleep, waking, and consciousness. *Philos. Compass* 15(4), e12661.
Windt, Nielsen, Thompson 2016 — Does consciousness disappear in dreamless sleep? *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 20(12), 871–882.
Woods, Windt, Carter 2024 — Evidence synthesis indicates contentless experiences in meditation are neither truly unitemporal nor identical. *Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci.* 23(2), 253–304.
Woods, Windt, Brown, Carter, Van Dam 2023 — Subjective experiences of committed meditators across practices aiming for contentless states. *Mindfulness* 14(6), 1457–1478.
Yaden, Le Nguyen, Kern, Wintering, Eichstaedt, Schwartz, Newberg 2017 — The noetic quality: a multimethod exploratory study. *Psychol. Conscious. Theory Res. Pract.* 4(1), 54.
Zhao, Kang, Feng, Levine & Song 2025 — Learning to Reason without External Rewards. arXiv:2505.19590.

*(Additional theory/AI/predictive-processing references present in the list but not central to Waypoint's staging problem are folded above; the list is complete to the best of extraction. Any entry I could not disambiguate from the rendered text — e.g. exact editors/translators of Buddhist primary sources — is marked with brackets and should be treated as UNVERIFIED until checked against the DOI/original.)*

### 4b. LOAD-BEARING CITATIONS shortlist (for measuring/staging meditation)

1. **Lutz, Jha, Dunne & Saron 2015** — "Phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices." *The* multi-axis decomposition of meditation states (object, aperture, clarity, effort, stability, etc.); direct precedent for Waypoint's per-pillar/axis profile over a single scalar.
2. **Dahl, Lutz & Davidson 2015** — Three families (attentional / constructive / deconstructive) of meditation. A validated taxonomy for classifying *which* practice a report reflects — maps onto the Wheel's parallel pillars and to dereification/deconstruction phenomenology.
3. **Laukkonen & Slagter 2021** — *From many to (n)one.* The FA→OM→ND continuum and predictive-mind plasticity; the ordering backbone for §1b, and a seed-corpus companion paper.
4. **Laukkonen et al. 2023** — Cessations / *nirodha samāpatti*. The scientific frame for the `small_death`/cessation milestone and its after-effect signature (Stage-3 Unbinding markers).
5. **Metzinger 2020** — Minimal Phenomenal Experience / tonic alertness / "pure" consciousness. Defines the contentless-but-luminous top-of-Wheel phenomenology and the MPE-vs-dullness distinction.
6. **Gamma & Metzinger 2021** — **MPE-92M questionnaire.** An actual validated instrument profiling pure-awareness experiences in meditators — top candidate for the calibration battery (§7 of spec).
7. **Hanley, Nakamura & Garland 2018** — **NADA** (Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment). Validated instrument for nondual traits *and* states — candidate battery slot for the Awakening/Unbinding range.
8. **Fleming & Lau 2014** — "How to measure metacognition." Methods for quantifying metacognitive sensitivity — operationalizes the epistemic-depth/meta-awareness axis that Waypoint's awareness pillar leans on.
9. **Fleming 2020** — Awareness as inference in a higher-order state space. Ties epistemic depth/awareness to a measurable higher-order inference construct.
10. **Sparby & Sacchet 2024** — Unified account + classification of Jhāna (advanced concentrative absorption). A concrete staging/classification scheme for absorption states — directly relevant to the absorption-vs-dullness confusion pair and higher bands.
11. **Berkovich-Ohana et al. 2024** — Pattern Theory of Selflessness. A structured account of how the self-pattern transforms with practice — a framework for self/no-self markers across bands.
12. **Dor-Ziderman et al. 2013** — Mindfulness-induced selflessness (MEG neurophenomenology). Empirical neurophenomenology of self-boundary dissolution — anchors "no-self" self-reports to measurable correlates.
13. **Josipovic 2019** — Nondual awareness as non-representational reflexivity. Conceptual definition of ND used throughout; sharpens what ND markers should and shouldn't include.
14. **Burbea 2014** — *Seeing That Frees.* Practitioner-grade account of dereification/emptiness practice; source vocabulary for the dereification marker family (and, per §3, a contamination source to guard against).
15. **Grimmer, Laukkonen et al. 2022** (+ McGovern et al. 2024; Laukkonen et al. 2020, "dark side of eureka") — Eliciting *false* insights / felt-truth manipulation. The empirical basis for down-weighting self-reported noetic certainty — core to Waypoint's lane-5 anti-gaming/contamination design.
16. **Windt, Nielsen & Thompson 2016** (+ Woods et al. 2023/2024) — Contentless experiences / dreamless-sleep awareness. Method + evidence for the lucid-dreamless-sleep advanced marker and for rigorously handling "contentless" self-reports.
17. **Sandved-Smith et al. 2021** — Computational phenomenology of mental action (meta-awareness & attentional control via deep active inference). The formal modeling precedent for representing meta-awareness/attention as inference — informs the estimator's state space.
18. **Ramstead et al. 2022** — Generative models → generative passages (computational neurophenomenology). The methodological bridge from first-person report to generative-model parameters — the intellectual scaffold for LLM-marker-to-Bayesian-latent extraction.