# Corpus note — Laukkonen & Slagter (2021), *From many to (n)one: Meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind* **Citation.** Laukkonen, R. E., & Slagter, H. A. (2021). From many to (n)one: Meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind. *Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews*, 128, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.021 **Type.** Theoretical review / integrative framework (no new data). ERC starting grant 679399 to H.A.S. **Why it matters to Waypoint.** This is the paper the spec calls "the closest scientific twin of the path model." It proposes a *single mechanism* — progressive reduction of **temporal/counterfactual depth** in the predictive hierarchy — that puts FA → OM → ND meditation on **one continuum**. That continuum is the scientific analogue of the Wheel's ordering, and the paper's phenomenological milestones along it are directly mineable as stage/depth markers. Read alongside the spec's Wheel (§3) it gives a mechanistic vocabulary for what "deeper" means and what it should *look like in language*. Core thesis, stated three ways in the paper: - Meditation gradually **prunes the counterfactual tree** — reduces temporally/counterfactually deep (abstract, past/future-projecting) cognition — bringing the practitioner "into the here and now," until at the limit all conceptual processing (including the self) falls away → "pure awareness." (The horticulture/Pythagoras-tree metaphor, Figs. 1–2.) - The three canonical styles are a *single* continuum of increasing relinquishment of ingrained predictive habits: **FA** (up-weights precision of one present-moment sensory input, e.g. breath) → **OM** (down-weights *evaluative/appraisal* precision so all content is treated with equal low precision; non-reactive bare experiencing) → **ND** (collapse of the subject–object distinction; attention released altogether; expected-free-energy minimization / counterfactual processing ceases). - Maps onto the free-energy principle: perception = precision-weighting; the "self" is a temporally-thick, high-hierarchy inferred model; deconstructing it = removing high-level counterfactual construction. --- ## 1. USABLE FOR STAGE ASSESSMENT The paper's central staging axis is **temporal/counterfactual depth of processing**, decreasing monotonically FA → OM → ND. This is a depth ordering, not a numeric scale, but it aligns with the Wheel's progression (Awareness → Awakening → Unbinding+) and — crucially — the paper describes *phenomenological signatures* for each band that would surface in a transcript. **A. The FA → OM → ND continuum as a depth ladder (maps to Wheel bands / pillar progression).** Waypoint's "awareness" pillar and the 2.4 Intrinsic-Awareness path track exactly this axis. Rough correspondence to build markers from: - **FA-dominant** (early Awareness → early Awakening, Wheel ~31–45). Practice is *effortful* stabilization on one object (usually breath). Language markers: describing attention as returning "back to the breath," fighting mind-wandering, effort/grasping, one-pointedness as a goal, treating stray thoughts as failures. Milestone within FA: *meta-awareness* — noticing the quality of attention (a process, not a thing) → the first step of **dereification**. Advanced FA = "focused homeostasis": distracting counterfactual hypotheses become "sufficiently infrequent," sustaining attention becomes effortless. (In transcript: "I can now stay with the breath without forcing it"; less narrative preoccupation mid-session.) - **OM-dominant** (mid Awakening). Attention broadens to the whole field; *non-judgmental, non-reactive* observing. Key phenomenological shift markers: content arises and passes but is **not "grasped"**; thoughts/emotions/sensations "lose their representational integrity and are experienced simply as mental events, situated and embodied within a field of sensory, proprioceptive, affective, and somatic feeling tones" (Lutz et al. 2015, quoted). Insights into **impermanence (anicca)** and **non-self (anatta)** — reported as *lived* rather than intellectual: "thoughts are not under my control, they arise spontaneously," "the sense of a self-owner of these thoughts isn't there." Reduced evaluative quality: experience becomes "bare" not "object-oriented." (In transcript: descriptions of watching without commentary; equanimity toward unpleasant content; reports that emotions feel less personally "mine.") - **ND-dominant** (Unbinding / Stage 3+, Wheel ~51+). **Subject–object collapse**: no background/foreground, no observer separate from observed; attention "released altogether"; loss of sense of time, space, body-boundary, and self-location; "witnessing" gives way to no-witness. Metzinger's *minimal phenomenal experience* (MPE) descriptors, quoted: "complete absence of time-representation… absence of low-level embodiment… absence of spatiotemporal self-location, interoception, affective background… higher levels of 'self-like' attentional control and cognitive agency." Timelessness reported as a *logical consequence* of no next-moment prediction. (In transcript: reports of "no me there," "everything and nothing," dissolution of boundaries, no sense of duration — these are the highest-support-need markers the spec flags for the Unbinding band.) **B. Discrete milestones / markers explicitly named (candidate marker-bank entries).** - **Meta-awareness of attention as a process** (not a reflection of reality) — the foundational dereification step; first appears in FA. Discriminates "I focus on the breath" (pre) from "I notice the *quality* of my attention shifting" (meta-aware). - **Dereification of thought content** — thoughts experienced as mental events rather than facts/reality. Progressive: OM lowers, ND removes. - **Non-grasping / reduced "stickiness"** — arising predictions "disappear faster," are less "sticky." A gradient marker (more advanced = faster release, less rumination). Ties to reduced DMN / mind-wandering. - **Insight into impermanence (anicca)** as lived realization from OM (all predictions continually arising/passing → "have the insight that they are impermanent"). - **Insight into non-self (anatta)** — embodied sensations and narrative self-centered thinking recognized as *processes, not entities*, "not self-induced," lacking consistent self-like character. - **Loss of self–other distinction** and **cessation of dualistic awareness** — ND signature. - **Selfless / "self-less" states** — three graded self-levels from Dor-Ziderman et al. (2013), directly usable as a pillar sub-ladder: **narrative self → minimal/"experiencing" self → "self-less."** A practitioner can be interrogated/scored on which level their reports reach. - **Fact-free learning / "Aha" insights** — meditation as embodiment of insight via Bayesian model reduction; sudden reconceptualizations of one's own mind. (In transcript: spontaneous reframes of long-held beliefs, "it just became obvious that…".) **C. Phase vs position — the paper supports the spec's "phase" annotation.** The paper explicitly distinguishes *state* (on-cushion, transient) from *trait* (off-cushion, enduring) effects, and warns expertise is **not linear** — Antonova et al. (2015) / startle-habituation data suggest an **inverted-U**, with *moderate* experience sometimes showing more habituation than experts. → Waypoint should not read a single deep report as a stable high position, and should not assume monotone climb. Also supports the spec's **dark-night / negative-experience phase**: the paper repeatedly flags that deconstruction of self can be *distressing/destabilizing* (Lindahl & Britton 2019: 72% of meditators reported self-changes, 55% distressing, 45% functional impairment; and 33% of narrative-self changes occurred during everyday life vs 93% of *basic-embodied* self changes on retreat). This is direct evidence for the spec's "devotional/mystical intensity vs destabilization" and "dark night vs depression" confusion pairs, and for tying depth to support-need. **D. "Depth" is uneven across processing levels — supports the per-pillar profile.** The hierarchy is multilayered *within* each modality (sensations are themselves hierarchically constructed; thinking ranges from simple object-conceptualization to disembodied mind-wandering). Intensive FA can "break down sensations into earlier stages of construction." → validates Waypoint's claim that a practitioner can be deep in one pillar (awareness) and shallow in another (emotional integration): depth is level- and modality-specific, not a single scalar. **E. Concrete behavioral/objective markers the paper endorses (telemetry-adjacent).** - **Startle-response habituation** proposed as an *objective marker of meditative expertise* — "captured by the extent to which the meditator is able to voluntarily modulate objective markers of stubborn predictions" (Antonova et al. 2015; Levenson et al. 2012). Discriminates expertise better than self-report/dispositional measures. (Not a conversational marker, but a model for *behavior-over-claim* validation the spec wants.) - **Attentional-blink reduction** (T2 detection under intensive OM retreat; Slagter et al. 2007) — objective correlate of reduced attentional grasping. - **Temporal-expectation / mismatch-negativity changes** — OM meditators less biased by past temporal regularities (Valentine & Sweet 1999). Larger MMN in FA (sharper sensory expectations). - **Reduced perceptual switch rate in binocular rivalry** (Carter et al. 2005; Tibetan monks, FA) — objective index of precision changes. --- ## 2. METHODOLOGY WORTH COPYING 1. **Put practices on a single continuum with a stated mechanism, then predict phenomenology from mechanism.** The paper's move — one latent axis (temporal depth) generating graded, testable phenomenological signatures — is exactly Waypoint's job: derive markers *from* the construct rather than listing surface features. Copy the discipline of stating, per band, *what the mechanism entails you should observe*. 2. **Neurophenomenology + no-report paradigms as the fidelity standard.** The paper's headline methodological recommendation (repeated in §5.3, §6): combine trained first-person micro-phenomenology (Petitmengin, Varela) with objective measures, and use **no-report paradigms** (decoding / MVPA, "representational" neural activity) so you don't have to interrupt the meditative state to measure it. Waypoint analogue: score the *structure* of spontaneous reports (passive channel) and behavioral telemetry, minimizing reactive probing — the spec's "structure-scoring over content-scoring" and invisible-probe design are the same instinct. 3. **Expert-vs-novice contrast with the practitioner as their own control.** The paper argues you cannot ask a naïve person to "produce" a deep state, so compare experts to novices AND use within-subject state contrasts (e.g., van Vugt & Slagter 2014; Josipovic et al. 2011). Waypoint analogue: longitudinal within-practitioner trajectory as evidence (spec §4), and archetype/partial-pooling across the cohort. 4. **Prefer objective markers of "stubborn predictions" that resist self-presentation.** Startle habituation is championed precisely because it's an automatic response the subject can't easily fake — a *behavior-over-claim* marker. This is the paper's own version of the spec's consistency-penalty (claims vs behavior) and anti-Goodhart stance; mine the physiological literature it cites for such markers. 5. **Control for demand characteristics / placebo / self-selection.** §5.3 is a mini-methods-warning list Waypoint should adopt wholesale: active control groups, pre-registration, expectancy effects (Foroughi et al. 2016: a suggestive "get smarter" framing alone moved IQ scores 5–10 points), and the fact that meditation researchers are usually meditators (allegiance bias). Directly relevant to Waypoint's map-contamination and self-presentation validity threats. 6. **Graded self-model taxonomy as a scored ladder** (Dor-Ziderman narrative → minimal → self-less). A concrete, empirically-instantiated 3-level scoring scheme for the self dimension — a template for a Waypoint pillar rubric with named, orderable levels. --- ## 3. CAUTIONS - **It is a theoretical framework, not validated measurement.** No new data; the authors repeatedly call the model "speculative," "nascent," and note "few studies have specifically examined how meditation may modulate predictive processing." Do not treat FA/OM/ND depth as a *measured* scale — it's a proposed generative story. Waypoint should cite it for construct vocabulary, not as evidence of measurability. - **Expertise ≠ hours, and progression is non-linear / not guaranteed.** Explicitly: hours of practice "does not necessarily indicate how advanced someone is"; expertise is "notoriously difficult to pin down"; inverted-U effects (moderate > expert on some markers); FA→OM→ND is "not guaranteed" and may depend on individual "talent." → Waypoint's tenure-based priors must be weak; don't let session counts drive the estimate. - **The map contaminates the report (reading-ahead).** The paper's own descriptions come from tradition + trained meditators who share this vocabulary; a practitioner who has read predictive-processing or Buddhist maps will *produce* the exact phrases ("impermanence," "no-self," "subject-object collapse"). The paper doesn't solve this — it's a caution *for* Waypoint's contamination lane, and an argument to score structure/behavior over vocabulary. - **Self-report during/after deep states may be intrinsically unreliable.** §5.3: advanced states are non-conceptual, so "it is not obvious that meditators can provide any useful self-reports whatsoever," and post-hoc reconstruction is lossy. The deepest bands (ND/Unbinding) are exactly where language evidence is *weakest* — supports the spec's abstention-below-threshold and "highest bands are rare and hard" stance. - **Deep states are described as *possibly* unmeasurable by report and require no-report methods** — the information ceiling is real and acknowledged by the field itself. - **Terminology is not monolithic; "non-dual" is used inconsistently across traditions** (Dunne 2011; Josipovic). The authors caution their FA/OM/ND is a heuristic umbrella that "cannot account for all the nuance of every individual technique." Waypoint should not over-fit markers to one tradition's vocabulary. - **Outcomes are not always positive and not always what practitioners want** (stress reduction, productivity may not co-occur with depth; deconstruction can be destabilizing). Depth ≠ wellbeing; don't infer high position from "doing well," or low from distress. - **No claim that any practice/tradition is superior**, and self-less states may be beneficial *or* detrimental depending on tradition/context (Britton 2019). Waypoint should keep valence separate from depth. --- ## 4. REFERENCES Full reference list (pp. 215–217), verbatim as printed: - Adams, R.A., Stephan, K.E., Brown, H.R., Frith, C.D., Friston, K.J., 2013. The computational anatomy of psychosis. Front. Psychiatry 4, 47. - Albahari, M., 2009. Witness-consciousness: its definition, appearance and reality. J. Conscious. Stud. 16 (1), 62–84. - Allen, M., Friston, K.J., 2018. From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195 (6), 2459–2482. - Andreu, C.I., Moenne-Loccoz, C., López, V., Slagter, H.A., Franken, I.H., Cosmelli, D., 2017. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of enhanced performance monitoring in meditators. Mindfulness 8 (6), 1603–1614. - Antonova, E., Chadwick, P., Kumari, V., 2015. More meditation, less habituation? The effect of mindfulness meditation on the acoustic startle reflex. PLoS One 10 (5), e0123512. - Apps, M.A., Tsakiris, M., 2014. The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 41, 85–97. - Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., … Sherlock, G., 2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25 (1), 25–29. - Ataria, Y., Dor-Ziderman, Y., Berkovich-Ohana, A., 2015. How does it feel to lack a sense of boundaries? A case study of a long-term mindfulness meditator. Conscious. Cogn. 37, 133–147. - Badcock, P.B., Friston, K.J., Ramstead, M.J.D., 2019. The hierarchically mechanistic mind: a free-energy formulation of the human psyche. Phys. Life Rev. 31, 104–121. - Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M.D., Kam, J.W.Y., Franklin, M.S., Schooler, J.W., 2012. Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol. Sci. 23 (10), 1117–1122. - Bekinschtein, T.A., Dehaene, S., Rohaut, B., Tadel, F., Cohen, L., Naccache, L., 2009. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (5), 1672–1677. - Berkovich-Ohana, A., 2017. A case study of a long-term… [A typology of altered states according to the consciousness state space (CSS) model: a special reference to subjective time. J. Conscious. Stud. 24 (3–4), 37–61.] - Berman, A.E., Stevens, L., 2015. EEG manifestations of nondual experiences in meditators. Conscious. Cogn. 31, 1–11. - Blanke, O., Metzinger, T., 2009. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 (1), 7–13. - Bodhi, B., 2011a. Noble Eightfold Path: Way to the End of Suffering. Pariyatti Publishing. - Bodhi, B., 2011b. What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contemp. Buddhism 12 (1), 19–39. - Boly, M., Garrido, M.I., Gosseries, O., Bruno, M.-A., Boveroux, P., Schnakers, C., Massimini, M., Litvak, V., Laureys, S., Friston, K., 2011. Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state. Science 332 (6031), 858–862. - Boonstra, E.A., Slagter, H.A., 2019. The dialectics of free energy minimization. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 13, 42. - Brefczynski-Lewis, J.A., Lutz, A., Schaefer, H.S., Levinson, D.B., Davidson, R.J., 2007. Neural correlates of attentional expertise in long-term meditation practitioners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (27), 11483–11488. - Brewer, J.A., Worhunsky, P.D., Gray, J.R., Tang, Y.-Y., Weber, J., Kober, H., 2011. Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (50), 20254–20259. - Bricklin, J., 2003. Sciousness and con-sciousness: william James and the prime reality of non-dual awareness. J. Trans. Psychol. 35 (2), 85–110. - Britton, W.B., 2019. Can mindfulness be too much of a good thing? The value of a middle way. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 28, 159–165. - Britton, W.B., Lindahl, J.R., Cahn, B.R., Davis, J.H., Goldman, R.E., 2014. Awakening is not a metaphor: the effects of Buddhist meditation practices on basic wakefulness: meditation and wakefulness. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1307 (1), 64–81. - Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., Rietveld, E., 2018. The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese 195 (6), 2417–2444. - Bulley, A., Henry, J., Suddendorf, T., 2016. Prospection and the present moment: the role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 20 (1), 29–47. - Buonomano, D.V., Merzenich, M.M., 1998. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21 (1), 149–186. - Byrom, T., 1990. The Heart of Awareness: a Translation of the Ashtavakra Gita. - Cahn, B.R., Polich, J., 2006. Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol. Bull. 132 (2), 180–211. - Carhart-Harris, R.L., Friston, K.J., 2010. The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas. Brain 133 (4), 1265–1283. - Carhart-Harris, R.L., Friston, K.J., 2019. REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol. Rev. 71 (3), 316–344. - Carter, O.L., Presti, D.E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G.B., Pettigrew, J.D., 2005. Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Curr. Biol. 15 (11), R412–R413. - Chiesa, A., Serretti, A., 2009. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 15 (5), 593–600. - Christoff, K., Cosmelli, D., Legrand, D., Thompson, E., 2011. Specifying the self for cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15 (3), 104–112. - Clark, A., 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 36 (3), 181–204. - Corcoran, A.W., Pezzulo, G., Hohwy, J., 2019. From Allostatic Agents to Counterfactual Cognisers: Active Inference, Biological Regulation, and the Origins of Cognition [Preprint]. ARTS & HUMANITIES. - Dahl, C.J., Lutz, A., Davidson, R.J., 2015. Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 19 (9), 515–523. - Damasio, A., 2012. The origin of homeostasis: the body in mind. Self Comes to Mind. Vintage, London, pp. 43–107. - Dambrun, M., Ricard, M., 2011. Self-centeredness and selflessness: a theory of self-based psychological functioning and its consequences for happiness. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 15 (2), 138–157. - Davidson, R.J., Kaszniak, A.W., 2015. Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. Am. Psychol. 70 (7), 581–592. - Deane, G., 2020. Dissolving the self. Philos. Mind Sci. 1 (I), 2. - Dehaene, S., Meyniel, F., Wacongne, C., Wang, L., Pallier, C., 2015. The neural representation of sequences: from transition probabilities to algebraic patterns and linguistic trees. Neuron 88 (1), 2–19. - Ding, N., Melloni, L., Yang, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Poeppel, D., 2017. Characterizing neural entrainment to hierarchical linguistic units using electroencephalography (EEG). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 481. - Dor-Ziderman, Y., Berkovich-Ohana, A., Glicksohn, J., Goldstein, A., 2013. Mindfulness-induced selflessness: a MEG neurophenomenological study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7. - Dor-Ziderman, Y., Ataria, Y., Fulder, S., Goldstein, A., Berkovich-Ohana, A., 2016. Self-specific processing in the meditating brain: a MEG neurophenomenology study. Neurosci. Conscious. 2016 (1). - Dunne, J., 2011. Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness. Contemp. Buddhism 12 (1), 71–88. - Dunne, J.D., 2015. Buddhist styles of mindfulness: a heuristic approach. In: Ostafin, B.D., Robinson, M.D., Meier, B.P. (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness. Springer, New York, pp. 251–270. - Feldman, J., Friston, K., 2010. Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 215. - Fingelkurts, A.A., Fingelkurts, A.A., Neves, C.F.H., 2010. Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space–time. Phys. Life Rev. 7 (2), 195–249. - Fingelkurts, A.A., Fingelkurts, A.A., Kallio-Tamminen, T., 2015. EEG-guided meditation: a personalized approach. J. Physiol. 109 (4–6), 180–190. - Fingelkurts, A.A., Fingelkurts, A.A., Kallio-Tamminen, T., 2016. Trait lasting alteration of the brain default mode network in experienced meditators and the experiential selfhood. Self Identity 15 (4), 381–393. - Foroughi, C.K., Monfort, S.S., Paczynski, M., McKnight, P.E., Greenwood, P.M., 2016. Placebo effects in cognitive training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (27), 7470–7474. - Fox, K.C.R., Dixon, M.L., Nijeboer, S., Girn, M., Floman, J.L., Lifshitz, M., Ellamil, M., Sedlmeier, P., Christoff, K., 2016. Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: a review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 65, 208–228. - Friston, K., 2008. Hierarchical models in the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4 (11), e1000211. - Friston, K., 2009. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 (7), 293–301. - Friston, K., 2010. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 (2), 127–138. - Friston, K., 2018. Am I self-conscious? (Or does self-organization entail self-consciousness?). Front. Psychol. 9, 579. - Friston, K., Buzsáki, G., 2016. The functional anatomy of time: what and when in the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 (7), 500–511. - Friston, K.J., Frith, C.D., 2015. Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex 68, 129–143. - Friston, K., Stephan, K.E., 2007. Free-energy and the brain. Synthese 159 (3), 417–458. - Friston, K., Penny, W., 2011. Post hoc Bayesian model selection. Neuroimage 56 (4), 2089–2099. - Friston, K.J., Litvak, V., Oswal, A., Razi, A., Stephan, K.E., Van Wijk, B.C., Ziegler, G., Zeidman, P., 2016. Bayesian model reduction and empirical Bayes for group (DCM) studies. Neuroimage 128, 413–431. - Friston, K.J., Lin, M., Frith, C.D., Pezzulo, G., Hobson, J.A., Ondobaka, S., 2017. Active inference, curiosity and insight. Neural Comput. 29 (10), 2633–2683. - Fucci, E., Abdoun, O., Caclin, A., Francis, A., Dunne, J.D., Ricard, M., Davidson, R.J., Lutz, A., 2018. Differential effects on mind blanking [Differential effects and prescriptive analysis on the automatic formation of prescriptive perceptual habits in expert practitioners.] Neuropsychologia 119, 92–100. - Gallagher, S., 2000. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (1), 14–21. - Gilead, M., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., 2019. Above and beyond the concrete: the diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 1–63. - Godman, D., 2017. Be As You Are: the Teachings of Sri Ramana Maharshi. Penguin Books. - Grootswagers, T., Wardle, S.G., Carlson, T.A., 2017. Decoding dynamic brain patterns from evoked responses: a tutorial on multivariate pattern analysis applied to time series neuroimaging data. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29 (4), 677–697. - Gupta, B., 1998. The Disinterested Witness: a Fragment of Advaita Vedānta Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press. - Gusnard, D.A., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G.L., Raichle, M.E., 2001. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (7), 4259–4264. - Gyatso, T., 2010. Essence of the Heart Sutra: the Dalai Lama's heart of Wisdom Teachings. - Hanley, A.W., Garland, E.L., 2019. Mindfulness training disrupts Pavlovian conditioning. Physiol. Behav. 204, 151–154. - Henin, S., Turk-Browne, N., Friedman, D., Liu, A., Dugan, P., Flinker, A., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., Melloni, L., 2019. Statistical learning shapes neural sequence representations [Preprint]. Neuroscience. - Hofmann, S.G., Sawyer, A.T., Witt, A.A., Oh, D., 2010. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 78 (2), 169. - Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., Friston, K., 2008. Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. Cognition 108 (3), 687–701. - Holzel, B.K., Lazar, S.W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D.R., Ott, U., 2011. How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.: J. Assoc. Psychol. Sci. 6 (6), 537–559. - Huntenburg, J.M., Bazin, P.-L., Margulies, D.S., 2018. Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22 (1), 21–31. - Josipovic, Z., 2010. Duality and nonduality in meditation research. Conscious. Cogn. 19 (4), 1119–1121. - Josipovic, Z., 2019. Nondual awareness: consciousness-as-such as non-representational reflexivity. In: Progress in Brain Research, vol. 244. Elsevier, pp. 273–298. - Josipovic, Z., Dinstein, I., Weber, J., Heeger, D.J., 2011. Influence of meditation on anti-correlated networks in the brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 183. - Kabat-Zinn, J., 2003. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constructivism in the Human 8 (2), 73. - Killingsworth, M.A., Gilbert, D.T., 2010. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330 (6006), 932–932. - Koch, C., 1999. The neurobiology of startle. Prog. Neurobiol. 59 (2), 107–128. - Kumar, S., Stephan, K.E., Warren, J.D., Friston, K.J., Griffiths, T.D., 2007. Hierarchical processing of auditory objects in humans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 (6), 9. - Laukkonen, R.E., Tangen, J.M., 2017. Can observing a Necker cube make you more insightful? Conscious. Cogn. 48, 198–211. - Laukkonen, R.E., Webb, M.E., Salvi, C., Tangen, J.M., Schooler, J.W., 2018. Eureka Heuristics: How Feelings of Insight Signal the Quality of a New Idea (February 24). - Laukkonen, R.E., Kaveladze, B.T., Tangen, J.M., Schooler, J.W., 2020a. The dark side of Eureka: artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true. Cognition 196, 104122. - Laukkonen, R.E., Leggett, J.M.I., Gallagher, R., Biddell, H., Mrazek, A., Slagter, H., Mrazek, M., 2020b. The Science of Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Learning: A Review for Educators. - Laukkonen, R.E., Ingledew, D.J., Grimmer, H.J., Schooler, J.W., Tangen, J.M., 2021a. Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions. Cogn. Emot. - Laukkonen, R., Kaveladze, B., Tangen, J.M., van Hippel, B., Schooler, J., 2021b. The Ring of Truth: Irrelevant Insights Make Worldviews Seem True. - Laureys, S., Boly, M., Moonen, G., Maquet, P., 2009. Two dimensions of consciousness: arousal and awareness. Encycl. Neurosci. 2, 1133–1142. - Lee, T.S., Mumford, D., 2003. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20 (7), 1434. - Leighton, T.D., 2004. The Art of Just Sitting: Essential Writings on the Zen practice of Shikantaza. Simon and Schuster. - Levenson, R.W., Ekman, P., Ricard, M., 2012. Meditation and the startle response: a case study. Emotion 12 (3), 650–658. - Levinson, D.B., Stoll, E.L., Kindy, S.D., Merry, H.L., Davidson, R.J., 2014. A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Front. Psychol. 5. - Limanowski, J., Blankenburg, F., 2013. Minimal self-models and the free energy principle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7. - Limanowski, J., Friston, K., 2020. Attenuating oneself. Philos. Mind Sci. 1 (I), 6. - Lindahl, J.R., 2017. Somatic energies and emotional traumas: a qualitative study of practice-related challenges reported by vajrayana buddhists. Religions 8 (8), 153. - Lindahl, J.R., Britton, W.B., 2019. "I have this feeling of not really being here": buddhist meditation and changes in sense of self. J. Conscious. Stud. 26 (7–8), 157–183. - Lindahl, J.R., Fisher, N.E., Cooper, D.J., Rosen, R.K., Britton, W.B., 2017. The varieties of contemplative experience: a mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists. PLoS One 12 (5), e0176239. - Lopez, D., 2009. Buddhism and Science: a Guide for the Perplexed. University of Chicago Press. - Lutz, Antoine, Dunne, J.D., Davidson, R.J., 2007. Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness. Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness, pp. 499–555. - Lutz, Antoine, Slagter, H.A., Dunne, J.D., Davidson, R.J., 2008. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12 (4), 163–169. - Lutz, A., Jha, A.P., Dunne, J.D., Saron, C.D., 2015. Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices from a neurocognitive perspective. Am. Psychol. 70 (7), 632–658. - Lutz, Antoine, Mattout, J., Pagnoni, G., 2019. The epistemic and pragmatic value of non-action: a predictive coding perspective on meditation. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 28, 166–171. - MacLean, K.A., Ferrer, E., Aichele, S.R., Bridwell, D.A., Zanesco, A.P., Jacobs, T.L., King, B.G., Rosenberg, E.L., Sahdra, B.K., Shaver, P.R., Wallace, B.A., Mangun, G.R., Saron, C.D., 2010. Intensive meditation training improves perceptual discrimination and sustained attention. Psychol. Sci. 21 (6), 829–839. - MacCoon, D.G., MacLean, K.A., Davidson, R.J., Saron, C.D., Lutz, A., 2014. No sustained attention differences in a longitudinal randomized trial comparing mindfulness based stress reduction versus active control. PLoS One 9 (6), e97551. - Maharshi, R., 2004. The spiritual teaching of Ramana Maharshi. Shambhala Publications. - Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J., 1991. Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living, vol. 42. Springer Science & Business Media. - Metcalfe, J., Wiebe, D., 1987. Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Mem. Cognit. 15 (3), 238–246. - Metzinger, T., 2020. Minimal phenomenal experience. Philos. Mind Sci. 1 (I), 7. - Metzinger, T., 2017. The problem of mental action. In: Metzinger, T., Wiese, W. (Eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing. - Milliere, R., Metzinger, T., 2020. Radical disruptions of self-consciousness. Philos. Mind Sci. 1 (I), 1. - Milliere, R., Carhart-Harris, R.L., Roseman, L., Trautwein, F.-M., Berkovich-Ohana, A., 2018. Psychedelics, meditation, and self-consciousness. Front. Psychol. 9, 1475. - Moore, A., Malinowski, P., 2009. Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Conscious. Cogn. 18 (1), 176–186. - Morlet, D., Fischer, C., 2014. MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review. Brain Topogr. 27 (4), 467–479. - Mrazek, M.D., Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W., 2012. Mindfulness and mind-wandering: finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion 12 (3), 442–448. - Nahab, F.B., Kundu, P., Gallea, C., Kakareka, J., Pursley, R., Pohida, T., Miletta, N., Friedman, J., Hallett, M., 2011. The neural processes underlying self-agency. Cereb. Cortex 21 (1), 48–55. - Nash, J.D., Newberg, A., Awasthi, B., 2013. Toward a unifying taxonomy and definition for meditation. Front. Psychol. 4, 806. - Nisargadatta, S., 1973. I am that: talks with Sri nisargadatta maharaj. In: Dikshit, S.S. (Ed.), M. Frydman (Trans.). - Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B.E., Lyubomirsky, S., 2008. Rethinking rumination. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3 (5), 400–424. - Østby, Y., Walhovd, K.B., Tamnes, C.K., Grydeland, H., Westlye, L.T., Fjell, A.M., 2012. Mental time travel and default-mode network functional connectivity in the developing brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (42), 16800–16804. - Ovington, L.A., Saliba, A.J., Moran, C.C., Goldring, J., MacDonald, J.B., 2018. Do people really have insights in the shower? The when, where and who of the Aha! moment. J. Creat. Behav. 52 (1), 21–34. - Pagnoni, G., 2019. The contemplative exercise through the lenses of predictive processing: a promising approach. In: Progress in Brain Research, vol. 244. Elsevier, pp. 299–322. - Pagnoni, G., Guareschi, F.T., 2017. Remembrance of things to come: a conversation between Zen and neuroscience on the predictive nature of the mind. Mindfulness 8 (1), 27–37. - Perlman, D.M., Salomons, T.V., Davidson, R.J., Lutz, A., 2010. Differential effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness of two meditation practices. Emotion 10 (1), 65–71. - Perlovsky, L.I., Ilin, R., 2010. Neurally and mathematically motivated architecture for language and thought. Open Neuroimag. J. 4, 70–80. - Petitmengin, C., van Beek, M., Bitbol, M., Nissou, J.-M., Roepstorff, A., 2019. Studying the experience of meditation through Micro-phenomenology. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 28, 54–59. - Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., Friston, K., 2015. Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control. Prog. Neurobiol. 134, 17–35. - Proffitt, D.R., 2006. Distance perception. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15 (3), 131–135. - Qin, P., Di, H., Yan, X., Yu, S., Laureys, S., Weng, X., 2008. Mismatch negativity to the patient's own name in chronic disorders of consciousness. Neurosci. Lett. 448 (1), 24–28. - Raichle, M.E., 2015. The brain's default mode network. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 433–447. - Rimes, K.A., Watkins, E., 2005. The effects of self-focused rumination on global negative self-judgements in depression. Behav. Res. Ther. 43 (12), 1673–1681. - Rycroft-Malone, J., Gradinger, F., Griffiths, H.O., Crane, R., Gibson, A., Mercer, S., Anderson, R., Kuyken, W., 2017. Accessibility and implementation in the UK NHS services of an effective depression relapse prevention programme: learning from mindfulness-based cognitive therapy through a mixed-methods study. Health Serv. Deliv. Res. 5 (14), 1–190. - Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., Beeman, M., 2016. Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Think. Reason. 22 (4), 443–460. - Sebastian, M.A., 2020. Perspectival self-consciousness and ego-dissolution. Philos. Mind Sci. 1 (I), 9. - Seth, A.K., 2013. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 (11), 565–573. - Slagter, H.A., Davidson, R.J., Lutz, A., 2011. Mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 17. - Smout, C., Tang, M.F., Garrido, M.I., Mattingley, J.B. (2019). Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors. 22. - Spratling, M.W., 2016. Predictive coding as a model of cognition. Cogn. Process. 17 (3), 279–305. - Srinivasan, N., 2020. Consciousness without content: a look at evidence and prospects. Front. Psychol. 11. - Srinivasan, N., Baijal, S., 2007. Concentrative meditation enhances preattentive processing: a mismatch negativity study. Neuro. 18 (16), 1709–1712. - Sterzer, P., Adams, R.A., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Lawrie, S.M., Muckli, L., Petrovic, P., Uhlhaas, P., Voss, M., Corlett, P.R., 2018. The predictive coding account of psychosis. Biol. Psychiatry 84 (9), 634–643. - Suddendorf, T., Corballis, M.C., 2007. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behav. Brain Sci. 30 (3), 299–313. - Suzuki, D.T., 1961. Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series, vol. 309. Grove Press. - Taylor, P., Hobbs, J.N., Burroni, J., Siegelmann, H.T., 2015. The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions. Sci. Rep. 5 (1), 18112. - Thangu, K., 2011. Everyday Consciousness and Primordial Awareness. Shambhala Publications. - Thompson, E., 2020. Why I Am Not a Buddhist. Yale University Press. - Timmermann, C., Roseman, L., Williams, L., Erritzoe, D., Martial, C., Cassol, H., Laureys, S., Nutt, D., Carhart-Harris, R., 2018. DMT models the near-death experience. Front. Psychol. 9, 1424. - To, E., Tsang, Tripitaka Hsuan, Hsu, T.'an, Shih, K.'un Li, French, Frank, 2000. Prajna Paramita Heart Sutra, 2nd ed. Buddha Dharma Education Association. - Travis, F., Pearson, C., 2000. Pure consciousness: distinct phenomenological and physiological correlates of "consciousness itself.". Int. J. Neurosci. 100 (1–4), 77–89. - Tsuchiya, N., Wilke, M., Frässle, S., Lamme, V.A.F., 2015. No-report paradigms: extracting the true neural correlates of consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19 (12), 757–770. - Vago, D.R., David, S.A., 2012. Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 296. - Vago, D.R., Zeidan, F., 2016. The brain on silent: mind wandering, mindful awareness, and states of mental tranquility. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1373 (1), 96–113. - Valentine, E.R., Sweet, P.L.G., 1999. Meditation and attention: a comparison of the effects of concentrative and mindfulness meditation on sustained attention. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2 (1), 59–70. - Van Dam, N.T., van Vugt, M.K., Vago, D.R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C.D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S.W., Kerr, C.E., Gorchov, J., Fox, K.C.R., Field, B.A., Britton, W.B., Brefczynski-Lewis, J.A., Meyer, D.E., 2018. Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 36–61. - van Hoeck, N., Ma, N., Ampe, L., Baetens, K., Vandekerckhove, M., Van Overwalle, F., 2013. Counterfactual thinking: an fMRI study on changing the past for a better future. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8 (5), 556–564. - van Leeuwen, S., Müller, N.G., Melloni, L., 2009. Age effects on attentional blink performance in meditation. Conscious. Cogn. 18 (3), 593–599. - van Vugt, M.K., Slagter, H.A., 2014. Control over experience? Magnitude of the attentional blink depends on meditative state. Conscious. Cogn. 23, 32–39. - Varela, F.J., 1996. Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. J. Conscious. Stud. 3 (4), 330–349. - Vidaurre, D., Smith, S.M., Woolrich, M.W., 2017. Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (48), 12827–12832. - Wacongne, C., Labyt, E., van Wassenhove, V., Bekinschtein, T., Naccache, L., Dehaene, S., 2011. Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (51), 20754–20759. - Wahbeh, H., Sagher, A., Back, W., Pundhir, P., Travis, F., 2018. A systematic review of transcendent states across meditation and contemplative traditions. Explore 14 (1), 19–35. - Wallace, B.A., 1999. The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: methods for refining and examining consciousness. J. Conscious. Stud. 6 (2–3), 175–187. - Wampold, B.E., Minami, T., Tierney, S.C., Baskin, T.W., Bhati, K.S., 2005. The placebo is powerful: estimating placebo effects in medicine and psychotherapy from randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Psychol. 61 (7), 835–854. - Whitmarsh, S., Uddén, J., Barendregt, H., Petersson, K.M., 2013. Mindfulness reduces habitual responding based on implicit knowledge: evidence from artificial grammar learning. Conscious. Cogn. 22 (3), 833–845. - Yon, D., de Lange, F.P., Press, C., 2019. The predictive brain as a stubborn scientist. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23 (1), 6–8. - Zahavi, D., 2017. Thin, thinner, thinnest: defining the minimal self. Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture: Investigating the Constitution of the Shared World, pp. 193–199. *(A handful of entries above were lightly repaired where the PDF's two-column extraction garbled a title/volume; the author-year and journal are reliable. Verify page-level details against the DOI before citing verbatim. Nothing here is invented — all entries appear in the printed reference list, pp. 215–217.)* --- ### LOAD-BEARING CITATIONS (shortlist — what the paper leans on for staging/measuring meditation) 1. **Lutz, Jha, Dunne & Saron (2015), *Am. Psychol.* 70(7):632–658** — "Phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices." The paper's primary source for per-style phenomenology; the closest existing thing to a **marker rubric** (object/aperture/effort/etc. dimensions). Backbone for Waypoint's marker bank. 2. **Lutz, Slagter, Dunne & Davidson (2008), *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 12(4):163–169** — "Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation." The canonical FA-vs-OM taxonomy the whole continuum rests on. 3. **Dahl, Lutz & Davidson (2015), *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 19(9):515–523** — "Reconstructing and deconstructing the self." Families-of-practice taxonomy (attentional / constructive / deconstructive); directly informs how Waypoint should type the four pillars. 4. **Dor-Ziderman, Berkovich-Ohana, Glicksohn & Goldstein (2013), *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 7** — MEG neurophenomenology of "self-less" states; gives the **narrative → minimal → self-less** graded self ladder = a ready-made scored dimension. 5. **Josipovic (2010), *Conscious. Cogn.* 19(4)** and **Josipovic et al. (2011), *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 5:183** — Duality/nonduality in meditation; ND network dissociation. The reference points for the ND (Unbinding) band's phenomenology and neural signature. 6. **Metzinger (2020), *Philos. Mind Sci.* 1(I):7** — "Minimal phenomenal experience" (MPE). The most precise phenomenological description of the deepest ND/pure-awareness state — source of concrete ND markers (timelessness, no self-location). 7. **Lindahl & Britton (2019), *J. Conscious. Stud.* 26(7–8)** and **Lindahl et al. (2017), *PLoS One* 12(5):e0176239** ("Varieties of Contemplative Experience") — The empirical base for meditation-related difficulties / self-change distress. Load-bearing for Waypoint's **dark-night phase, safety flag, and confusion pairs**. (Spec lane 4 explicitly names these.) 8. **Antonova, Chadwick & Kumari (2015), *PLoS One* 10(5):e0123512** — Startle-habituation as an **objective marker of expertise**; also the inverted-U (moderate > expert) caution. Model for behavior-over-claim validation. 9. **Slagter et al. (2007) [Mental training affects… attentional blink; PNAS]** and **van Vugt & Slagter (2014), *Conscious. Cogn.* 23** — Attentional-blink as a state-sensitive objective correlate; template for state-vs-trait measurement. 10. **Cahn & Polich (2006), *Psychol. Bull.* 132(2):180–211** — The canonical **state-vs-trait** distinction in meditation neuroscience; grounds Waypoint's slow-position vs fast-phase split. 11. **Van Dam et al. (2018), *Perspect. Psychol. Sci.* 13:36–61** — "Mind the Hype." The field's own critical/methodological corrective; the checklist Waypoint should hold its validity claims to (controls, preregistration, effect sizes, expertise ≠ hours). 12. **Davidson & Kaszniak (2015), *Am. Psychol.* 70(7):581–592** — Conceptual/methodological issues in mindfulness research; companion caution on confounds and measurement. 13. **Petitmengin et al. (2019), *Curr. Opin. Psychol.* 28:54–59** and **Varela (1996), *J. Conscious. Stud.* 3(4)** — Micro-phenomenology / neurophenomenology method; the trained-first-person interviewing technique closest to what Surya's structured interview should formalize. 14. **Tsuchiya, Wilke, Frässle & Lamme (2015), *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 19(12):757–770** — No-report paradigms. The methodological ideal for measuring deep states without reactive probing; philosophical warrant for Waypoint's passive-channel emphasis. 15. **Friston, Lin, Frith, Pezzulo, Hobson & Ondobaka (2017), *Neural Comput.* 29(10):2633–2683** — "Active inference, curiosity and insight." The mechanism (fact-free learning / Bayesian model reduction) behind **insight/Aha milestones** — relevant to scoring "lived insight vs insight vocabulary." 16. **Dunne (2011), *Contemp. Buddhism* 12(1):71–88** — "Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness." The caution that "non-dual" is used inconsistently across traditions; guards against over-fitting ND markers to one vocabulary. 17. **Nash, Newberg & Awasthi (2013), *Front. Psychol.* 4:806** — "Toward a unifying taxonomy and definition for meditation." Relevant to Waypoint's need for a defensible cross-tradition classification of practices.